#5 Hosting provider standards #16

Merged
tom merged 1 commit from 5-hosting-standards into main 2025-12-28 09:06:32 +00:00
Owner
No description provided.
@ -0,0 +6,4 @@
We can gain from using things like S3-style object storage or managed
database instances, especially for smaller utility services.
## Migration risk-appitite
Owner

app-e-tite :)

_app-**_e_**-tite_ :)
tom marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +46,4 @@
For data protection reasons, keeping our data within Europe is likely
our best bet.
When selecting a provider, we should make sure we know the juristictions
Owner

juris-d-iction :)

juris-**_d_**-iction :)
tom marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +51,4 @@
services we are using. This may be easier to do with a smaller provider.
Not all of the co-op's services need the same level of concern regarding
location/Juristiction - for example, a CDN node is lower risk than an
Owner

spelling/caps

spelling/caps
tom marked this conversation as resolved
Owner

Nits aside, LGTM

Nits aside, LGTM
tom force-pushed 5-hosting-standards from 79525b00a3 to cd5ac526fc 2025-12-28 09:05:13 +00:00 Compare
Author
Owner

Spelling fails fixed

Spelling fails fixed
tom merged commit 51b1ca1266 into main 2025-12-28 09:06:32 +00:00
tom deleted branch 5-hosting-standards 2025-12-28 09:06:32 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
spoons.technology/plots!16
No description provided.