Adult content policy? #14
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
From time to time, I see adult content creators talking about their horrible dramas with basically everything.
We probably need to have a stance, and pick services that align with it.
Also, more broadly, we really need to think about the OSA, and equivalent legislation. Might have to rope in Neil Brown, if he's not thoroughly sick of the subject by now.
Given the current architecture you've proposed, it seems like 'we' might be legally responsible for the core services (in a sane world the ones we've suggested so far wouldn't be seen as 'user to user' services, but ofcom is ofcom), whereas ideally the people running auxiliary services would be responsible for what they run. We'd need to get that legally checked out though.
Following on, if someone on the 'core' team also runs an auxiliary service that falls under the OSA, does this muddy the waters at all, legally?
Came back to comment - perhaps we should start with a "no adult content" policy.
Then we can loosen once we know what we can do, rather than needing to tighten the rules
oh and, agree there should be some Neil in our lives